Filed: Oct. 06, 2020
Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6316 JASON BOLDEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. REX BLOCKER; ANNE ELIZABETH CUCCIO, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (9:18-cv-03473-DCC) Submitted: September 28, 2020 Decided: October 6, 2020 Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6316 JASON BOLDEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. REX BLOCKER; ANNE ELIZABETH CUCCIO, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (9:18-cv-03473-DCC) Submitted: September 28, 2020 Decided: October 6, 2020 Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion...
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6316
JASON BOLDEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
REX BLOCKER; ANNE ELIZABETH CUCCIO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort.
Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (9:18-cv-03473-DCC)
Submitted: September 28, 2020 Decided: October 6, 2020
Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jason Bolden, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jason Bolden appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge, granting summary judgment to Appellees, and dismissing without
prejudice Bolden’s complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of
Federal Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971), for failure to exhaust administrative
remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bolden v. Blocker, No. 9:18-cv-03473-
DCC (D.S.C. Jan. 27, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2