Filed: Oct. 26, 2020
Latest Update: Oct. 26, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6450 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOHN SAMUEL LEIGH, a/k/a J. R., a/k/a J.D., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:00-cr-00057-GMG-25) Submitted: October 22, 2020 Decided: October 26, 2020 Before WYNN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam op
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6450 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOHN SAMUEL LEIGH, a/k/a J. R., a/k/a J.D., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:00-cr-00057-GMG-25) Submitted: October 22, 2020 Decided: October 26, 2020 Before WYNN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opi..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6450
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JOHN SAMUEL LEIGH, a/k/a J. R., a/k/a J.D.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:00-cr-00057-GMG-25)
Submitted: October 22, 2020 Decided: October 26, 2020
Before WYNN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Samuel Leigh, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Akira Finucane, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Martinsburg, West
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
John Samuel Leigh appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P.
60(d) motion to alter or amend a prior order denying relief on Leigh’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255
motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Leigh, No. 3:00-cr-00057-
GMG-25 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 11, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2