Filed: Sep. 29, 2020
Latest Update: Sep. 29, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6521 RICARDO FISHBOURNE, a/k/a Ricardo Fishburne, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COLLETON COUNTY SOLICITOR OFFICE; COLLETON COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (2:20-cv-00122-TMC) Submitted: September 24, 2020 Decided: September 29, 2020 Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAX
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6521 RICARDO FISHBOURNE, a/k/a Ricardo Fishburne, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COLLETON COUNTY SOLICITOR OFFICE; COLLETON COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (2:20-cv-00122-TMC) Submitted: September 24, 2020 Decided: September 29, 2020 Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXL..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6521
RICARDO FISHBOURNE, a/k/a Ricardo Fishburne,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COLLETON COUNTY SOLICITOR OFFICE; COLLETON COUNTY SHERIFF
OFFICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (2:20-cv-00122-TMC)
Submitted: September 24, 2020 Decided: September 29, 2020
Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ricardo Fishbourne, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ricardo Fishbourne appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Fishbourne’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Fishbourne v. Colleton Cnty. Solic. Off., No. 2:20-cv-
00122-TMC (D.S.C. Apr. 7, 2020). We deny Fishbourne’s motion for appointment of
counsel and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2