Filed: Oct. 20, 2020
Latest Update: Oct. 20, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6576 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. IVAN ALEXANDER COPELAND, a/k/a Bert, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:13-cr-00091-RGD-DEM-1) Submitted: October 8, 2020 Decided: October 20, 2020 Before KEENAN, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6576 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. IVAN ALEXANDER COPELAND, a/k/a Bert, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:13-cr-00091-RGD-DEM-1) Submitted: October 8, 2020 Decided: October 20, 2020 Before KEENAN, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6576 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. IVAN ALEXANDER COPELAND, a/k/a Bert, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:13-cr-00091-RGD-DEM-1) Submitted: October 8, 2020 Decided: October 20, 2020 Before KEENAN, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ivan Alexander Copeland, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ivan Alexander Copeland appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under Section 404 of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Copeland, No. 2:13-cr-00091-RGD-DEM-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 20, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
