Filed: Oct. 23, 2020
Latest Update: Oct. 23, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6718 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MATTHEW JAMES DURY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:08-cr-00016-MR-1) Submitted: October 16, 2020 Decided: October 23, 2020 Before WYNN and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6718 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MATTHEW JAMES DURY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:08-cr-00016-MR-1) Submitted: October 16, 2020 Decided: October 23, 2020 Before WYNN and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6718 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MATTHEW JAMES DURY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:08-cr-00016-MR-1) Submitted: October 16, 2020 Decided: October 23, 2020 Before WYNN and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Matthew James Dury, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Matthew James Dury appeals the district court’s order denying his postjudgment motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dury, No. 1:08-cr-00016-MR- 1 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 27, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
