United States Court of Appeals
                              For the Eighth Circuit
                          ___________________________

                                  No. 19-3009
                          ___________________________

                               William Leroy Sanders

                        lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner - Appellant

                                            v.

                              United States of America

                        lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent - Appellee
                                        ____________

                      Appeal from United States District Court
                   for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines
                                   ____________

                           Submitted: September 25, 2020
                              Filed: October 5, 2020
                                  [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before COLLOTON, BENTON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
                          ____________

PER CURIAM.

      William Leroy Sanders appeals after the district court1 denied his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255 motion, and granted a certificate of appealability on his claim that his sentence

      1
      The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the
Southern District of Iowa.
under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), is invalid in light
of Johnson v. United States, 

, 606 (2015) (invalidating residual clause
of ACCA as unconstitutionally vague). Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,
this court affirms.

      This court concludes Sanders did not meet his burden to show by a
preponderance of the evidence that the residual clause led the sentencing court to
apply the ACCA enhancement. See Dembry v. United States, 

, 1187
(8th Cir. 2019) (standard of review); Golinveaux v. United States, 

, 567-
68 (8th Cir. 2019) (movant bringing Johnson claim must show by preponderance of
evidence that residual clause led sentencing court to apply ACCA enhancement).

      The judgment is affirmed.
                     ______________________________




                                         -2-