Filed: Oct. 01, 2020
Latest Update: Oct. 01, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-3763 _ Christopher L. Buie lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Administrative Review Board of the United States Department of Labor lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Department of Labor (except OSHA) _ Submitted: September 28, 2020 Filed: October 1, 2020 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Christopher Buie petitions for review of a final order from the
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-3763 _ Christopher L. Buie lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Administrative Review Board of the United States Department of Labor lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Department of Labor (except OSHA) _ Submitted: September 28, 2020 Filed: October 1, 2020 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Christopher Buie petitions for review of a final order from the ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-3763
___________________________
Christopher L. Buie
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
Administrative Review Board of the United States Department of Labor
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Department of Labor (except OSHA)
____________
Submitted: September 28, 2020
Filed: October 1, 2020
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Christopher Buie petitions for review of a final order from the United States
Department of Labor Administrative Review Board (ARB), affirming the denial of
his administrative complaint alleging that his employer fired him for engaging in
activities protected under the Surface Transportation Assistance Act. After careful
review, we conclude that the ARB’s decision was not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse
of discretion, contrary to the law, or unsupported by substantial evidence in the
record. See 49 U.S.C. § 31105(d) (appellate court reviews ARB’s decision pursuant
to Administrative Procedure Act); 5 U.S.C. § 706(2) (reviewing court shall hold
unlawful and set aside agency decision found to be arbitrary, capricious, abuse of
discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law, or if unsupported by substantial
evidence in record). Accordingly, we deny the petition. See 8th Cir. 47B. We also
deny Buie’s pending motion to supplement the record.
______________________________
-2-