Filed: Oct. 22, 2020
Latest Update: Oct. 23, 2020
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before GASTON, HOUTZ, and GERRITY Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Jason A. THOMPSON Culinary Specialist First Class, (E-6) U.S. Navy Appellant No. 201900156 Decided: 22 October 2020 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Military Judge: Jonathan T. Stephens Sentence adjudged 12 February 2019 by a general court-martial con- vened at Naval Base San Diego, California, consi
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before GASTON, HOUTZ, and GERRITY Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Jason A. THOMPSON Culinary Specialist First Class, (E-6) U.S. Navy Appellant No. 201900156 Decided: 22 October 2020 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Military Judge: Jonathan T. Stephens Sentence adjudged 12 February 2019 by a general court-martial con- vened at Naval Base San Diego, California, consis..
More
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
GASTON, HOUTZ, and GERRITY
Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Jason A. THOMPSON
Culinary Specialist First Class, (E-6) U.S. Navy
Appellant
No. 201900156
Decided: 22 October 2020
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.
Military Judge:
Jonathan T. Stephens
Sentence adjudged 12 February 2019 by a general court-martial con-
vened at Naval Base San Diego, California, consisting of a military
judge sitting alone. Sentence approved by the convening authority:
confinement for 210 days, a bad-conduct discharge and reduction in
rank to E-1.
For Appellant:
Lieutenant Clifton E. Morgan III, JAGC, USN
For Appellee:
Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
United States v. Thompson, No. 201900156
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are cor-
rect in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s
substantial rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10
U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2