Filed: Oct. 27, 2020
Latest Update: Oct. 28, 2020
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before GASTON, HOUTZ, and PENNIX Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Alejandro E. RAMOS Aviation Ordnanceman Airman (E-3), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 202000021 Decided: 27 October 2020 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Hayes C. Larsen Sentence adjudged 26 September 2019 by a special court-martial convened at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of a m
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before GASTON, HOUTZ, and PENNIX Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Alejandro E. RAMOS Aviation Ordnanceman Airman (E-3), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 202000021 Decided: 27 October 2020 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Hayes C. Larsen Sentence adjudged 26 September 2019 by a special court-martial convened at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of a mi..
More
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
GASTON, HOUTZ, and PENNIX
Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Alejandro E. RAMOS
Aviation Ordnanceman Airman (E-3), U.S. Navy
Appellant
No. 202000021
Decided: 27 October 2020
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge:
Hayes C. Larsen
Sentence adjudged 26 September 2019 by a special court-martial
convened at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of a military
judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to
E-1, confinement for 12 months, and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant:
Lieutenant Commander R. Andrew Austria, JAGC, USN
For Appellee:
Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
United States v. Ramos, NMCCA No. 202000021
Opinion of the Court
_________________________
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law
and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial
rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C.
§§ 859, 866.
The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2