Filed: Sep. 15, 2020
Latest Update: Sep. 21, 2020
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before MONAHAN, CRISFIELD, and LAWRENCE Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Nicholas W. FREIDLINE Machinist’s Mate Nuclear Power Second Class (E-5), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 202000086 Decided: 15 September 2020 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Ann K. Minami Sentence adjudged 31 January 2020 by a special court-martial con- vened at Naval Base Kitsap, Breme
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before MONAHAN, CRISFIELD, and LAWRENCE Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Nicholas W. FREIDLINE Machinist’s Mate Nuclear Power Second Class (E-5), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 202000086 Decided: 15 September 2020 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Ann K. Minami Sentence adjudged 31 January 2020 by a special court-martial con- vened at Naval Base Kitsap, Bremer..
More
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
MONAHAN, CRISFIELD, and LAWRENCE
Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Nicholas W. FREIDLINE
Machinist’s Mate Nuclear Power Second Class (E-5), U.S. Navy
Appellant
No. 202000086
Decided: 15 September 2020
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge:
Ann K. Minami
Sentence adjudged 31 January 2020 by a special court-martial con-
vened at Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington, consisting of a
military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment:
confinement for five months, reduction to E-1, and a bad-conduct
discharge.
For Appellant:
Lieutenant Commander Jacqueline M. Leonard, JAGC, USN
For Appellee:
Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
United States v. Freidline, NMCCA No. 202000086
Opinion of the Court
_________________________
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law
and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial
rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice, arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C.
§§ 859, 866.
The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2