Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Freidline, 202000086 (2020)

Court: Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals Number: 202000086 Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 15, 2020
Latest Update: Sep. 21, 2020
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before MONAHAN, CRISFIELD, and LAWRENCE Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Nicholas W. FREIDLINE Machinist’s Mate Nuclear Power Second Class (E-5), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 202000086 Decided: 15 September 2020 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Ann K. Minami Sentence adjudged 31 January 2020 by a special court-martial con- vened at Naval Base Kitsap, Breme
More
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.




                             Before
               MONAHAN, CRISFIELD, and LAWRENCE
                    Appellate Military Judges

                        _________________________

                          UNITED STATES
                              Appellee

                                     v.

                     Nicholas W. FREIDLINE
     Machinist’s Mate Nuclear Power Second Class (E-5), U.S. Navy
                              Appellant

                             No. 202000086

                        Decided: 15 September 2020

    Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

                              Military Judge:
                              Ann K. Minami

 Sentence adjudged 31 January 2020 by a special court-martial con-
 vened at Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington, consisting of a
 military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment:
 confinement for five months, reduction to E-1, and a bad-conduct
 discharge.

                          For Appellant:
       Lieutenant Commander Jacqueline M. Leonard, JAGC, USN

                               For Appellee:
                            Brian K. Keller, Esq.

                        _________________________

      This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
            NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
             United States v. Freidline, NMCCA No. 202000086
                            Opinion of the Court

                         _________________________

PER CURIAM:
    After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law
and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial
rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice, arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C.
§§ 859, 866.
   The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.


                               FOR THE COURT:




                               RODGER A. DREW, JR.
                               Clerk of Court




                                      2


Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer