Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Fennig v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 17-2019 (2020)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: 17-2019 Visitors: 22
Judges: Brian H. Corcoran
Filed: Oct. 30, 2020
Latest Update: Oct. 30, 2020
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-2019V (not to be published) RANDALL FENNIG, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v. Filed: September 30, 2020 SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Special Processing Unit (SPU); HUMAN SERVICES, Attorney’s Fees and Costs Respondent. Renee Ja Gentry, The Law Office of Renee J. Gentry, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Voris Edward Johnson, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND
More
    In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                   OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                           No. 17-2019V
                                        (not to be published)


    RANDALL FENNIG,
                                                                Chief Special Master Corcoran
                         Petitioner,
    v.                                                          Filed: September 30, 2020


    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                     Special Processing Unit                 (SPU);
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                             Attorney’s Fees and Costs


                         Respondent.


Renee Ja Gentry, The Law Office of Renee J. Gentry, Washington, DC, for Petitioner.

Voris Edward Johnson, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

                       DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 1

        On December 22, 2017, Randall Fennig (“Petitioner”), filed a petition for
compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C.
§300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered Guillain-Barre
syndrome as a result of the influenza vaccine he received on October 17, 2016. (Petition
at 1). On July 1, 2020, a decision was issued awarding compensation to Petitioner based
on the Respondent’s proffer. (ECF No. 83).



1  Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the
internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from
public access.

2
 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
       Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, dated September
8, 2020 (ECF No. 88), requesting a total award of $73,504.28 (representing $62,942.45
in fees and $10,561.83 in costs). In accordance with General Order No. 9, counsel for
Petitioner represents that Petitioner has incurred out-of-pocket expenses in the amount
of $403.10 (ECF No. 88-1). Respondent reacted to the motion on September 8, 2020,
indicating that he is satisfied that the statutory requirements for an award of attorney’s
fees and costs are met in this case and defers to my discretion to determine the amount
to be awarded (ECF No. 89). Petitioner did not file a reply thereafter.

      I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner’s request. In my
experience, the request appears reasonable, and I find no cause to reduce the requested
hours or rates.

       The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.
Section 15(e). Accordingly, petitioner is awarded the total amount of $73,907.38 3
as follows:

            •    A lump sum of $73,504.28, representing reimbursement for fees and
                 costs, in the form of a check payable jointly to Petitioner and
                 Petitioner’s counsel and;

            •    A lump sum of $403.10, representing reimbursement for Petitioner’s
                 costs, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner.

      In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of
the Court), the Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                         s/Brian H. Corcoran
                                                         Brian H. Corcoran
                                                         Chief Special Master




3 This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all

charges by the attorney against a client, “advanced costs” as well as fees for legal services rendered.
Furthermore, § 15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including costs) that would
be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs.,
924 F.2d 1029
(Fed. Cir.1991).
4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice
renouncing their right to seek review.
                                                    2


Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer