United States v. Smith, CR-17-08211-002-PCT-DLR. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20190808807
Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 07, 2019
Summary: ORDER MICHELLE H. BURNS , Magistrate Judge . The defendant appeared in court with counsel. The defendant's probable cause hearing was waived, and the detention hearing was submitted on the record including a proffer by defense counsel. The Court finds probable cause to believe the defendant violated the terms of his supervised release as alleged in the petition. The Court further finds, pursuant to Rule 32.l(a)(6), that defendant has failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that he i
Summary: ORDER MICHELLE H. BURNS , Magistrate Judge . The defendant appeared in court with counsel. The defendant's probable cause hearing was waived, and the detention hearing was submitted on the record including a proffer by defense counsel. The Court finds probable cause to believe the defendant violated the terms of his supervised release as alleged in the petition. The Court further finds, pursuant to Rule 32.l(a)(6), that defendant has failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that he is..
More
ORDER
MICHELLE H. BURNS, Magistrate Judge.
The defendant appeared in court with counsel. The defendant's probable cause hearing was waived, and the detention hearing was submitted on the record including a proffer by defense counsel. The Court finds probable cause to believe the defendant violated the terms of his supervised release as alleged in the petition. The Court further finds, pursuant to Rule 32.l(a)(6), that defendant has failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that he is not a flight risk or a danger.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant shall be bound over for further proceedings on the petition to revoke his supervised release.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant is detained as a flight risk and a danger, pending further revocation proceedings.
Source: Leagle
