CLARKE v. SOPRAMCO CV8, 11-0643-CG-B. (2013)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20130730b10
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 29, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 29, 2013
Summary: ORDER CALLIE V. S. GRANADE, District Judge. After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, Sopramco CV8 motion to dismiss amended complaint (Doc. 53) is GRANTED, and plaintiffs' claims against defendant Sopramco CV8 hereby are DISMISSED with prejudic
Summary: ORDER CALLIE V. S. GRANADE, District Judge. After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, Sopramco CV8 motion to dismiss amended complaint (Doc. 53) is GRANTED, and plaintiffs' claims against defendant Sopramco CV8 hereby are DISMISSED with prejudice..
More
ORDER
CALLIE V. S. GRANADE, District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, Sopramco CV8 motion to dismiss amended complaint (Doc. 53) is GRANTED, and plaintiffs' claims against defendant Sopramco CV8 hereby are DISMISSED with prejudice.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
