In re Nelms, 2:14cv927-MHT. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20180828893
Visitors: 27
Filed: Aug. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 27, 2018
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . This appeal is before the court on appellant Keith A. Nelms's appeal of the bankruptcy court's decision in favor of the Chase Bank appellees. The bankruptcy court found that Nelms's debt to Chase from harm caused by his debt settlement scheme was non-dischargeable under 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(2)(A) because it was related to his fraud against Chase and Chase cardholders. This court will affirm on the basis of the well-reasoned opinion of the bankruptc
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . This appeal is before the court on appellant Keith A. Nelms's appeal of the bankruptcy court's decision in favor of the Chase Bank appellees. The bankruptcy court found that Nelms's debt to Chase from harm caused by his debt settlement scheme was non-dischargeable under 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(2)(A) because it was related to his fraud against Chase and Chase cardholders. This court will affirm on the basis of the well-reasoned opinion of the bankruptcy..
More
OPINION
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
This appeal is before the court on appellant Keith A. Nelms's appeal of the bankruptcy court's decision in favor of the Chase Bank appellees. The bankruptcy court found that Nelms's debt to Chase from harm caused by his debt settlement scheme was non-dischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) because it was related to his fraud against Chase and Chase cardholders. This court will affirm on the basis of the well-reasoned opinion of the bankruptcy court.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
Source: Leagle
