LEE v. DARBOUZE, 2:14-CV-584-WKW. (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20140801k43
Visitors: 19
Filed: Aug. 01, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 01, 2014
Summary: ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief District Judge. On July 8, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which Plaintiff filed a timely objection. (Docs. # 8, 11.) Upon an independent and de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, see 28 U.S.C. 636(b), it is ORDERED that the objection is OVERRULED, that the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to pay the filing and a
Summary: ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief District Judge. On July 8, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which Plaintiff filed a timely objection. (Docs. # 8, 11.) Upon an independent and de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, see 28 U.S.C. 636(b), it is ORDERED that the objection is OVERRULED, that the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to pay the filing and ad..
More
ORDER
W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief District Judge.
On July 8, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which Plaintiff filed a timely objection. (Docs. # 8, 11.) Upon an independent and de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), it is ORDERED that the objection is OVERRULED, that the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to pay the filing and administrative fees upon his initiation of this case.
Source: Leagle
