DANSBY v. McKINNES, 2:14-cv-072-WHA (WO). (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20140829p95
Visitors: 20
Filed: Aug. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 28, 2014
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge. This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #17), entered on July 30, 2014. There being no timely objection to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the Defendants. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Costs are taxed aga
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge. This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #17), entered on July 30, 2014. There being no timely objection to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the Defendants. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Costs are taxed agai..
More
ORDER
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #17), entered on July 30, 2014. There being no timely objection to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the Defendants.
3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
4. Costs are taxed against the Plaintiff.
Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order.
Source: Leagle
