FORTENBERRY v. MITCHEM, 5:11-cv-3561-AKK-HGD. (2013)
Court: District Court, N.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20130731986
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 30, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 30, 2013
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION ABDUL K. KALLON, District Judge. On July 8, 2013, the magistrate judge entered a report and recommendation and gave the parties until July 22, 2013 to file objections. Doc. 16. Neither party has filed any objections. After careful consideration of the record in this case and the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the report of the magistrate judge. The court further ACCEPTS the recommendation of the magistrate judge to DENY Fortenber
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION ABDUL K. KALLON, District Judge. On July 8, 2013, the magistrate judge entered a report and recommendation and gave the parties until July 22, 2013 to file objections. Doc. 16. Neither party has filed any objections. After careful consideration of the record in this case and the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the report of the magistrate judge. The court further ACCEPTS the recommendation of the magistrate judge to DENY Fortenberr..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ABDUL K. KALLON, District Judge.
On July 8, 2013, the magistrate judge entered a report and recommendation and gave the parties until July 22, 2013 to file objections. Doc. 16. Neither party has filed any objections.
After careful consideration of the record in this case and the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the report of the magistrate judge. The court further ACCEPTS the recommendation of the magistrate judge to DENY Fortenberry's petition for writ of habeas corpus because his claims are either unsupported or procedurally defaulted.
Source: Leagle
