Braggs v. Dunn, 2:14cv601-MHT. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20190225587
Visitors: 16
Filed: Feb. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2019
Summary: PHASE 2A REVISED REMEDY SCHEDULING ORDER ON THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIM MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . It is ORDERED that the unopposed motion for extension (doc. no. 2362) is granted and the remaining deadlines and dates for the Phase 2A remedy scheduling order for the Eighth Amendment claim are revised as follows: OLD DATES NEW DATES SEGREGATION Parties to develop schemes to Continued verify that defendants are now generally accurately
Summary: PHASE 2A REVISED REMEDY SCHEDULING ORDER ON THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIM MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . It is ORDERED that the unopposed motion for extension (doc. no. 2362) is granted and the remaining deadlines and dates for the Phase 2A remedy scheduling order for the Eighth Amendment claim are revised as follows: OLD DATES NEW DATES SEGREGATION Parties to develop schemes to Continued verify that defendants are now generally accurately ..
More
PHASE 2A REVISED REMEDY SCHEDULING ORDER ON THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIM
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
It is ORDERED that the unopposed motion for extension (doc. no. 2362) is granted and the remaining deadlines and dates for the Phase 2A remedy scheduling order for the Eighth Amendment claim are revised as follows:
OLD DATES NEW DATES
SEGREGATION
Parties to develop schemes to Continued
verify that defendants are now generally
accurately and timely identifying pending
SMI inmates with regard to mediation and
segregation resolution of
the monitoring
issue
Briefs due regarding remedies for 3/5/19
violations found in supplemental
liability opinion (doc. no.
2353).
HOSPITAL-LEVEL CARE
Parties are to submit revised 3/1/19 at noon
stipulations that reflect changes
agreed upon at 2/7/19 hearing
Defendants are to file statement 3/1/19 at noon
as to whether revised
stipulations meet the PLRA's
`need-narrowness-intrusiveness'
requirements. Counsel for
plaintiffs have already said that
they do.
SUICIDE PREVENTION
Parties to submit joint proposals 2/21/19 2/28/19
on `methods' defendants can use
to verify that segregation rounds
are being properly conducted in
segregation and segregation-like
settings (doc. no. 2345).
Parties to submit to the court a 2/21/19
list of the agreed-upon
segregation-like settings, as
well as the settings
about which they may not be able
to reach an agreement (doc. no.
2345).
Defendants to develop a `review 2/28/29
process' that collects and
consolidates information on
at least a weekly basis for each
prisoner in ADOC with SMI who is
housed in segregation; that is, a
"tracking process" (doc. no.
2345).
Parties to submit a joint report 2/28/19
to the court as to other prisons
that do not place (or
significantly limit the placement
of) SMI prisoners in segregation
(doc. no. 2345).
Defendants to begin submitting to 3/7/19
court the results for "tracking
process' of SMIs in segregation
(doc. no. 2345).
Experts to submit report per 3/8/19
adopted Joint Notice Regarding
Process for Assessing Suicide
Prevention Measures (doc. no.
2014)
Evidentiary hearing on 3/12/19 at
plaintiffs' motion for 9:00 a.m.
preliminary injunctions (doc. no.
2276)
Deadline for parties to mediate 3/22/19
any objection or dispute per
adopted Joint Notice (doc. no.
2014)
Pretrial briefs (in which parties 3/29/19
are to set forth and discuss with
clarity the objections, if any,
to the experts' report) per
adopted Joint Notice (doc. no.
2014)
Pretrial hearing per adopted 4/2/19 at
Joint Notice (doc. no. 2014) 10:00 a.m.
Evidentiary hearing per adopted 4/9/19 at 9:00
Joint Notice (doc. no. 2014) a.m.
DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS
Parties are to submit revised 3/1/19 at noon
stipulations that reflect changes
agreed upon at 2/7/19 hearing
Defendants are to file statement 3/1/19 at noon
as to whether revised
stipulations meet the PLRA's
`need-narrowness-intrusiveness'
requirements. Counsel for
plaintiffs have already said that
they do.
Parties are to submit joint 3/1/19 at noon
proposal for deadlines (a) for
development of stipulations'
proposed training module and (b)
for beginning of the substantive
implementation of the training
MISCELLANEOUS
Defendants are to file statement 3/1/19 at noon
as to whether all remedial
stipulations previously approved
and adopted by the court meet the
PLRA's
`need-narrowness-intrusiveness'
requirements. Counsel for
plaintiffs have already said that
they do.
Source: Leagle
