SMITH v. HOWARD, Civil Action 14-0299-WS-M. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20150421b95
Visitors: 15
Filed: Apr. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 20, 2015
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE , Chief District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that summary judgment be granted in favor of Defendants Ronzella Howard, Dexter Brown, and Sharon Langham and that Plaintiff's action against Defendants be
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE , Chief District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that summary judgment be granted in favor of Defendants Ronzella Howard, Dexter Brown, and Sharon Langham and that Plaintiff's action against Defendants be d..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM H. STEELE, Chief District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court.
It is ORDERED that summary judgment be granted in favor of Defendants Ronzella Howard, Dexter Brown, and Sharon Langham and that Plaintiff's action against Defendants be dismissed with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
