DANSBY v. BABERS, 2:14cv-070-WHA(WO). (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20150203933
Visitors: 2
Filed: Feb. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 02, 2015
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge. This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #16), entered on January 12, 2015. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 2. Judgment is granted in favor of the Defendants. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Costs are
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge. This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #16), entered on January 12, 2015. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 2. Judgment is granted in favor of the Defendants. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Costs are t..
More
ORDER
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #16), entered on January 12, 2015. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
2. Judgment is granted in favor of the Defendants.
3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
4. Costs are taxed against the Plaintiff.
5. Final Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Source: Leagle
