Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Gordon v. U.S., 1:15-00055-WS-N. (2018)

Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama Number: infdco20181116734 Visitors: 17
Filed: Nov. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 15, 2018
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE , District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendations (Doc. 58 1 ) of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B)-(C), Rule 8(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings for the United States District Courts, and S.D. Ala. GenLR 72(a)(2)(R), and dated September 17, 2018, is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Movan
More

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendations (Doc. 581) of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)-(C), Rule 8(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings for the United States District Courts, and S.D. Ala. GenLR 72(a)(2)(R), and dated September 17, 2018, is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Movant John Bush Gordon, Jr.'s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 47) is DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that Gordon is not entitled to a Certificate of Appealability in relation to this final adverse order. Finally, the Court certifies that any appeal of this order and accompanying judgment would be without merit and therefore not taken in good faith. Thus, Gordon is not entitled proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

Final judgment in accordance with this order shall issue separately under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. All "Doc." citations herein refer to the docket of the above-styled criminal action.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer