Pence v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, CV 18-00218-TUC-JAS (DTF). (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20190925947
Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 24, 2019
Summary: ORDER JAMES A. SOTO , District Judge . Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Ferraro. As the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation appropriately resolved the issues at bar, the objections are denied. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Magistrate Judge Ferraro's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19) is accepted and adopted. (2) The decision of the ALJ is affirmed. (3) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and clo
Summary: ORDER JAMES A. SOTO , District Judge . Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Ferraro. As the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation appropriately resolved the issues at bar, the objections are denied. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Magistrate Judge Ferraro's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19) is accepted and adopted. (2) The decision of the ALJ is affirmed. (3) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and clos..
More
ORDER
JAMES A. SOTO, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Ferraro. As the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation appropriately resolved the issues at bar, the objections are denied.1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
(1) Magistrate Judge Ferraro's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19) is accepted and adopted.
(2) The decision of the ALJ is affirmed.
(3) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this case.
FootNotes
1. The Court reviews de novo the objected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Court reviews for clear error the unobjected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation. See Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); see also Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F.Supp.2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).
Source: Leagle