COOK v. SCHRIRO, CV-97-146-PHX-RCB. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20120608963
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jun. 07, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 07, 2012
Summary: ORDER ROBERT C. BROOMFIELD, District Judge. Petitioner, an Arizona capital prisoner, has lodged a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), along with a motion to exceed page limitations for the Rule 60(b) motion. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to File Excess Pages for Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) (Doc. 115) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall file Petitioner's lodged Motion for Relief from Judgmen
Summary: ORDER ROBERT C. BROOMFIELD, District Judge. Petitioner, an Arizona capital prisoner, has lodged a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), along with a motion to exceed page limitations for the Rule 60(b) motion. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to File Excess Pages for Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) (Doc. 115) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall file Petitioner's lodged Motion for Relief from Judgment..
More
ORDER
ROBERT C. BROOMFIELD, District Judge.
Petitioner, an Arizona capital prisoner, has lodged a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), along with a motion to exceed page limitations for the Rule 60(b) motion.
Good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to File Excess Pages for Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) (Doc. 115) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall file Petitioner's lodged Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) (Doc. 116).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall file a response to Petitioner's Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(b) no later than Monday, June 18, 2012. Because this Court has returned the state court record to the Arizona Supreme Court, Respondents shall append to their response copies of any documents or transcripts from the state court record relevant to consideration of Petitioner's motion.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner may file a reply no later than Monday, June 25, 2012.
Source: Leagle
