Dickens v. U.S., 13-0122-WS-MU. (2017)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20171102867
Visitors: 22
Filed: Oct. 31, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2017
Summary: JUDGMENT WILLIAM H. STEELE , District Judge . In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the government's motion to dismiss (Doc. 94) Michael Alan Dickens' motion to vacate be GRANTED and that Dickens' motion to vacate (Doc. 89; compare id. with Docs. 92, 96 & 98-99) be dismissed as time-barred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255(f)(1) & (3). Petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of appealability and, therefore, he is not enti
Summary: JUDGMENT WILLIAM H. STEELE , District Judge . In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the government's motion to dismiss (Doc. 94) Michael Alan Dickens' motion to vacate be GRANTED and that Dickens' motion to vacate (Doc. 89; compare id. with Docs. 92, 96 & 98-99) be dismissed as time-barred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255(f)(1) & (3). Petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of appealability and, therefore, he is not entit..
More
JUDGMENT
WILLIAM H. STEELE, District Judge.
In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the government's motion to dismiss (Doc. 94) Michael Alan Dickens' motion to vacate be GRANTED and that Dickens' motion to vacate (Doc. 89; compare id. with Docs. 92, 96 & 98-99) be dismissed as time-barred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(1) & (3). Petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of appealability and, therefore, he is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis.
Source: Leagle
