205 Ruidoso Investments, LLC v. Westfield Insurance Company, 19-243 CG/SMV. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20191008q98
Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 01, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AS TO COUNT II AND COUNT III OF PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT CARMEN E. GARZA , Chief Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Westfield Insurance Company's Stipulation to Dismiss Count II and Count III of Plaintiff's Original Complaint (the "Stipulation"), (Doc. 47), filed September 26, 2019. In the Stipulation, the parties agree that Plaintiff's Count II for Unfair Insurance Claim Practices, Count III for Bad Faith, any c
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AS TO COUNT II AND COUNT III OF PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT CARMEN E. GARZA , Chief Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Westfield Insurance Company's Stipulation to Dismiss Count II and Count III of Plaintiff's Original Complaint (the "Stipulation"), (Doc. 47), filed September 26, 2019. In the Stipulation, the parties agree that Plaintiff's Count II for Unfair Insurance Claim Practices, Count III for Bad Faith, any cl..
More
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AS TO COUNT II AND COUNT III OF PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
CARMEN E. GARZA, Chief Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Westfield Insurance Company's Stipulation to Dismiss Count II and Count III of Plaintiff's Original Complaint (the "Stipulation"), (Doc. 47), filed September 26, 2019. In the Stipulation, the parties agree that Plaintiff's Count II for Unfair Insurance Claim Practices, Count III for Bad Faith, any claim for punitive damages, and any claim for attorneys' fees and costs against Defendant shall be dismissed with prejudice from this lawsuit, with each party bearing their own attorneys' fees and costs. The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation, finds the Stipulation is well-taken and shall be GRANTED. Therefore, the only remaining cause of action in this lawsuit is Plaintiff's Count I for breach of contract.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
