Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, MDL 15-02641-PHX DGC. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Arizona Number: infdco20181005915 Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 03, 2018
Summary: CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 37 DAVID G. CAMPBELL , Senior District Judge . The Court held a final pretrial conference with the parties on September 6, 2018. This Order will reflect matters discussed during the final pretrial conference. A. Jury Selection. The Court will excuse for hardship the jurors listed in Docs. 12113 and 12375. In addition, the Court will excuse jurors 19 and 179 for hardship. After hearing arguments from the parties, the Court excused the following jurors for cause:
More

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 37

The Court held a final pretrial conference with the parties on September 6, 2018. This Order will reflect matters discussed during the final pretrial conference.

A. Jury Selection.

The Court will excuse for hardship the jurors listed in Docs. 12113 and 12375. In addition, the Court will excuse jurors 19 and 179 for hardship.

After hearing arguments from the parties, the Court excused the following jurors for cause: 9, 35, 40, 49, 61, 63, 66, 78, 80, 118, 146, 163, and 199.

The Court will call the 55 potential jurors listed below to appear for jury selection on the morning of September 18, 2018. By noon on September 14, 2018, the parties shall provide the Court with a list of witnesses to be provided to potential jurors on the morning of September 18, 2018.

2 3 4 5 6 15 16 18 20 21 22 23 25 28 29 30 31 32 38 42 44 46 50 51 52 58 59 62 64 67 68 70 71 72 74 75 76 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 90 92 95 103 105 106 107 109 110 111 114

The Court provided counsel with proposed voir dire questions. Counsel should be prepared to address those questions before the start of trial on September 18, 2018.

The Court provided counsel with proposed preliminary jury instructions. Counsel should be prepared to address any objections to those instructions before the start of trial on September 18, 2018.

B. Issues to be Resolved Before Trial.

The Court took under advisement Defendants' argument that the negligence per se claim is preempted, Plaintiffs' objection to the use of Dr. Asch's previous trial testimony during trial, and Defendants' contention that the presumption in Wis. Stat. § 895.047(3)(B) should apply in this case. The Court has entered its Order (Doc. 12589) on this issue.

The parties have provided the Court with a number of additional deposition designations. The Court has reviewed the designations and entered its Order (Doc. 12590) on the designations by the parties.

C. Final Pretrial Order.

The Court approved the parties' Final Pretrial Order (Doc. 12388) with a few modifications stated on the record. The Final Pretrial Order as approved will govern the trial in this case, and may be amended only upon the showing required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(e).

All other trial-related matters have been addressed in previous Orders of the Court.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer