POSS v. ASTRUE, 11-G-3120-NE. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20120523977
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 22, 2012
Latest Update: May 22, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION J. FOY GUIN, Jr., District Judge. The plaintiff, Bradley Victor Poss, brings this action seeking judicial review of a final adverse decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the Commissioner) denying his application for Social Security Benefits. Bradley Victor Poss filed an application for Social Security Benefits. Thereafter, plaintiff timely pursued and exhausted the administrative remedies available before the Commissioner. Accordingly, this cas
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION J. FOY GUIN, Jr., District Judge. The plaintiff, Bradley Victor Poss, brings this action seeking judicial review of a final adverse decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the Commissioner) denying his application for Social Security Benefits. Bradley Victor Poss filed an application for Social Security Benefits. Thereafter, plaintiff timely pursued and exhausted the administrative remedies available before the Commissioner. Accordingly, this case..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION
J. FOY GUIN, Jr., District Judge.
The plaintiff, Bradley Victor Poss, brings this action seeking judicial review of a final adverse decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the Commissioner) denying his application for Social Security Benefits. Bradley Victor Poss filed an application for Social Security Benefits. Thereafter, plaintiff timely pursued and exhausted the administrative remedies available before the Commissioner. Accordingly, this case is now ripe for judicial review pursuant to the provisions of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act (the Act), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
The sole function of this court is to determine whether the decision of the Commissioner is supported by substantial evidence and whether proper legal standards were applied. Bloodsworth v. Heckler, 703 F.2d 1233, 1239 (11th Cir. 1983). To that end this court "must scrutinize the record as a whole to determine if the decision reached is reasonable and supported by substantial evidence." Bloodsworth, at 1239 (citations omitted). Substantial evidence is "such relevant evidence as a reasonable person would accept as adequate to support a conclusion." Bloodsworth, at 1239. The court has carefully reviewed the entire record in this case and is of the opinion that the Commissioner's decision is supported by substantial evidence and that proper legal standards were applied in reaching that decision. Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner must be affirmed.
A separate order in conformity with this memorandum opinion will be entered.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle