KATHERINE P. NELSON, Magistrate Judge.
This matter came before the undersigned on February 14, 2017 for a pretrial conference. Present at the conference were the following: Assistant United States Attorney Lawrence Bullard; Frederick Helmsing, Esq., counsel for Defendant Heather Turner Erwin, and Cynthia Burney, Esq., counsel for Defendant Frank Peter Salamone. On February 14, 2017 AUSA Bullard filed a motion to continue the trial of this matter from its current March 2017 setting. (Doc. 47).
Mr. Helmsing advises that his client, Defendant Erwin, has no objection to the motion. However, Ms. Burney advises that her client, Defendant Salamone, opposes the motion and has filed written objections. (Doc. 49) Defendant Salamone objects to the continuance on the grounds, in sum, that he is the sole financial provider for his family and his continued detention is causing his family an extreme hardship. (Doc. 49)
Defendants are charged in a four count indictment with conspiracy to distribute Methylphenidate Hydrochloride (Ritalin), conspiracy to import Methylphenidate Hydrochloride (Ritalin), Possession with the Intent to Distribute Methylphenidate Hydrochloride (Ritalin) and Importation of a Controlled Substance. (Doc. 1) The undersigned notes that no motion for severance has been filed and the defendants are still joined for trial.
The undersigned finds that the ends of justice served by continuing this action for one (1) month outweighs the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(7)(A). Specifically, t ends of justice served by continuing the trial of Ms. Erwin and Mr. Salamone so their cases can be tried simultaneously with that of their recently arrested co-defendant, "outweighs the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial." 18 U.S.C.A. ` 3161(h)(7)(A). Specifically, because all three defendants are charged in the Indictment with participating in the same act or in the same series of acts or transactions (drug conspiracy,), it is more efficient for all involved to proceed on the case in one trial. For purposes of the Speedy Trial Act, any delay resulting from this continuance is excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(6) ("A reasonable period of delay when the defendant is joined for trial with a co-defendant as to whom the time for trial has not run and no motion for severance has been granted.").
Under these circumstances, and upon consideration of the objections filed by Defendant Salamone, the motion to continue is
Each defendant and his/her respective counsel filing a Speedy Trial Waiver on or before