CLARK v. CURRY, 2:14cv1175-MHT (WO). (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20150904535
Visitors: 25
Filed: Sep. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 03, 2015
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, plaintiff filed this lawsuit asserting that the defendants violated his First Amendment rights under the Establishment Clause by requiring him to attend a faith-based program as a condition of probation and penalizing him for not doing so. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that defendant Julie Moody's motion to dismiss be granted. There are no objections
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, plaintiff filed this lawsuit asserting that the defendants violated his First Amendment rights under the Establishment Clause by requiring him to attend a faith-based program as a condition of probation and penalizing him for not doing so. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that defendant Julie Moody's motion to dismiss be granted. There are no objections t..
More
OPINION
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff filed this lawsuit asserting that the defendants violated his First Amendment rights under the Establishment Clause by requiring him to attend a faith-based program as a condition of probation and penalizing him for not doing so. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that defendant Julie Moody's motion to dismiss be granted. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate judge's recommendation should be adopted.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
Source: Leagle
