Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Wyo Tech Investment Group LLC, CV-17-04140-PHX-DWL. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Arizona Number: infdco20191022710 Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 21, 2019
Summary: ORDER DOMINIC W. LANZA , District Judge . Now pending before the Court is the Judgment Creditors' "Ex Parte Motion for Leave to Make Alternative Service of Subpoenas on Purported Wyo Tech Investors." (Doc. 262.) In a nutshell, the motion seeks permission to serve document subpoenas on four non-parties (Mike Spaulding, Mike Wilhelm, Lewis Henkind, and Tom Burgess) by means other than personal service—specifically, by (1) sending the subpoena, via overnight FedEx, to each non-party's last kno
More

ORDER

Now pending before the Court is the Judgment Creditors' "Ex Parte Motion for Leave to Make Alternative Service of Subpoenas on Purported Wyo Tech Investors." (Doc. 262.) In a nutshell, the motion seeks permission to serve document subpoenas on four non-parties (Mike Spaulding, Mike Wilhelm, Lewis Henkind, and Tom Burgess) by means other than personal service—specifically, by (1) sending the subpoena, via overnight FedEx, to each non-party's last known address and (2) emailing a copy of the subpoena to the attorney who previously filed a motion to quash on behalf of the non-parties.

The motion will be granted in part and denied in part. In an earlier order in this case, the Court addressed the circumstances under which a Rule 45 subpoena may be served by means other than personal service. Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Wyo Tech Inv. Grp. LLC, 2019 WL 3208114 (D. Ariz. 2019). Among other things, this order noted that, although it is unclear whether a showing of diligence should be required in this context, "[m]any courts" impose such a diligence requirement. Id. at *3 n.3.

Here, the materials submitted by the Judgment Creditors establish that they exhibited diligence when attempting to locate and personally serve three of the four non-parties (Wilhelm, Spaulding, and Henkin). However, the Judgment Creditors have not established diligence with respect to the remaining non-party (Burgess), who appears to have simply moved out of state months ago. There is no evidence that Burgess is actively evading the subpoena and it is unclear what steps the Judgment Creditors have taken to discover his new out-of-state address.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

(1) The Judgment Creditors' Ex Parte Motion for Leave to Make Alternative Service of Subpoenas on Purported Wyo Tech Investors (Doc. 262) is granted in part and denied in part; and

(2) The Judgment Creditors are granted leave to serve nonparties Mike Spaulding, Mike Wilhelm, and Lewis Henkind with document subpoenas, with a return date of two weeks after entry of this order, by (1) overnight FedEx to (a) for Mike Spaulding, 10869 North Scottsdale Road, #130-135, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254 and 2061 East Charleston Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85022; (b) for Mike Wilhelm, 2059 East Michigan Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85022; and (c) for Lewis Henkind, 9673 East Oberlin Way, Scottsdale, Arizona 85262; and (2) e-mail to their counsel in this action, Mr. Zlaket, at tom@zlaketlaw.com.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer