Cameron v. Thomas, 16-0230-WS-B. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20180723583
Visitors: 19
Filed: Jul. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE , District Judge . After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Defendants', Corizon, Inc. and Kim Thomas, Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and the claims presented by the Plaintiff Johnny L. Cameron, are DISMISSED wi
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE , District Judge . After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Defendants', Corizon, Inc. and Kim Thomas, Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and the claims presented by the Plaintiff Johnny L. Cameron, are DISMISSED wit..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM H. STEELE, District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Defendants', Corizon, Inc. and Kim Thomas, Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and the claims presented by the Plaintiff Johnny L. Cameron, are DISMISSED with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
