Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Cooley v. Streeter, 1:18-00540-JB-N. (2020)

Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama Number: infdco20200130831 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 29, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 29, 2020
Summary: ORDER JEFFREY U. BEAVERSTOCK , District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 59) made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B)-(C), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), and S.D. Ala. GenLR 72(a)(2)(R), and dated December 26, 2019, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Plaintiff's "Motion for the Unserved Defendant(s) to be S
More

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 59) made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)-(C), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), and S.D. Ala. GenLR 72(a)(2)(R), and dated December 26, 2019, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Plaintiff's "Motion for the Unserved Defendant(s) to be Served, and Order for an Immediately [sic] Transfer to a Different Facility for the Plaintiff" (Doc. 39) is DENIED as to the request for a transfer to a different facility. The Court also certifies that any appeal by the Plaintiff of this denial of his request for injunctive relief would be without merit and therefore not taken in good faith. Thus, the Plaintiff is not entitled to appeal said denial in forma pauperis.

DONE and ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer