Christensen v. U.S., CV-18-8235-PCT-DGC (DMF). (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20190109c83
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jan. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER DEBORAH M. FINE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Petitioner's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend (Doc. 8), and upon good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED granting Petitioner's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend (Doc. 8). Petitioner shall file his Amended Motion and exhibits as a separate document within seven (7) days from the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States shall respond to Christensen's amended 2255 motion within 60 days from th
Summary: ORDER DEBORAH M. FINE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Petitioner's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend (Doc. 8), and upon good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED granting Petitioner's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend (Doc. 8). Petitioner shall file his Amended Motion and exhibits as a separate document within seven (7) days from the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States shall respond to Christensen's amended 2255 motion within 60 days from the..
More
ORDER
DEBORAH M. FINE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Petitioner's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend (Doc. 8), and upon good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED granting Petitioner's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend (Doc. 8). Petitioner shall file his Amended Motion and exhibits as a separate document within seven (7) days from the date of this Order.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States shall respond to Christensen's amended § 2255 motion within 60 days from the filing of the Amended Motion.
Source: Leagle