McCLELLAN v. BRYANT, 2:15cv139-MHT (WO). (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20150831604
Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 28, 2015
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, plaintiff, a state inmate, filed this lawsuit complaining of discrimination, retaliation, and intentional endangerment. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that plaintiff's case be dismissed for failure to prosecute the case and respond to orders of the court. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the reco
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, plaintiff, a state inmate, filed this lawsuit complaining of discrimination, retaliation, and intentional endangerment. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that plaintiff's case be dismissed for failure to prosecute the case and respond to orders of the court. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the recor..
More
OPINION
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff, a state inmate, filed this lawsuit complaining of discrimination, retaliation, and intentional endangerment. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that plaintiff's case be dismissed for failure to prosecute the case and respond to orders of the court. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate judge's recommendation should be adopted.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
Source: Leagle
