Hotchkiss v. Billups, CA 17-00019-WS-C. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20190620781
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jun. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT WILLIAM H. STEELE , District Judge . In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the amended habeas petition for federal habeas corpus relief, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 (Docs. 7 & 18), be DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner's claims for habeas relief cannot be granted because they are all time-barred or procedurally defaulted except for the Fourth Amendment claim. A review of the merits of the Fourth Am
Summary: JUDGMENT WILLIAM H. STEELE , District Judge . In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the amended habeas petition for federal habeas corpus relief, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 (Docs. 7 & 18), be DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner's claims for habeas relief cannot be granted because they are all time-barred or procedurally defaulted except for the Fourth Amendment claim. A review of the merits of the Fourth Ame..
More
JUDGMENT
WILLIAM H. STEELE, District Judge.
In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the amended habeas petition for federal habeas corpus relief, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Docs. 7 & 18), be DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner's claims for habeas relief cannot be granted because they are all time-barred or procedurally defaulted except for the Fourth Amendment claim. A review of the merits of the Fourth Amendment claim is unavailable to Petitioner because of his opportunity to fully and fairly litigate the merits of this claim in state court. Under the circumstances of this action, Petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of appealability and, in addition, he is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis.
Source: Leagle
