Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Le v. Zuffa, LLC, 2:15-cv-01045 RFB-(PAL). (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170926b50 Visitors: 28
Filed: Sep. 25, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 25, 2017
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Compel Production of Documents Responsive to Their Subpoena to Third Party Top Rank, Inc., and Motion to Compel Attendance at Deposition of Robert Arum, President of Top Rank, Inc. on July 31, 2017 (Doc. 470); WHEREAS, Top Rank filed an Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motions to Compel on August 23, 2017 (Doc. 481
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Compel Production of Documents Responsive to Their Subpoena to Third Party Top Rank, Inc., and Motion to Compel Attendance at Deposition of Robert Arum, President of Top Rank, Inc. on July 31, 2017 (Doc. 470);

WHEREAS, Top Rank filed an Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motions to Compel on August 23, 2017 (Doc. 481);

WHEREAS, this Court ordered that Plaintiffs shall have until August 30, 2017 to file a reply (Doc. 472);

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs need one more day to file the Reply in support of their Motions to Compel; and

WHEREAS, Top Rank and Defendants do not object to a one-day extension for Plaintiffs to have until August 31, 2017 to file their reply;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Parties that Plaintiffs shall have until August 31, 2017 to file their reply in support of their Motions to Compel as to Top Rank and Robert Arum.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer