Corbitt v. Taylor, 2:18cv91-MHT. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20190731918
Visitors: 22
Filed: Jul. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 30, 2019
Summary: ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . At oral argument today, the parties agreed to submission of the case on the record, with the restrictions of Federal Rule of Procedure 56 not applying. Therefore, and as stated during the hearing, the court will deny the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment. The issue remaining for the court to decide is whether to decide the case on the paper record or to hold a trial as to some or all issues. * * * Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the par
Summary: ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . At oral argument today, the parties agreed to submission of the case on the record, with the restrictions of Federal Rule of Procedure 56 not applying. Therefore, and as stated during the hearing, the court will deny the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment. The issue remaining for the court to decide is whether to decide the case on the paper record or to hold a trial as to some or all issues. * * * Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the part..
More
ORDER
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
At oral argument today, the parties agreed to submission of the case on the record, with the restrictions of Federal Rule of Procedure 56 not applying. Therefore, and as stated during the hearing, the court will deny the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment. The issue remaining for the court to decide is whether to decide the case on the paper record or to hold a trial as to some or all issues.
* * *
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the parties' motions for summary judgment (doc. nos. 46 & 50) are denied.
Source: Leagle
