Filed: May 15, 2015
Latest Update: May 15, 2015
Summary: ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Based on the record in this case, including the representations made in open court on May 15, 2015, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The government's motion to dismiss (doc. no. 95) is denied. (2) Defendant Mardedeus Mack shall continue under the conditions of supervised release previously set and modified by the court. (3) Defendant Mack's conditions of supervised release are modified to no longer require that he participate in the Location Monito
Summary: ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Based on the record in this case, including the representations made in open court on May 15, 2015, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The government's motion to dismiss (doc. no. 95) is denied. (2) Defendant Mardedeus Mack shall continue under the conditions of supervised release previously set and modified by the court. (3) Defendant Mack's conditions of supervised release are modified to no longer require that he participate in the Location Monitor..
More
ORDER
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Based on the record in this case, including the representations made in open court on May 15, 2015, it is ORDERED as follows:
(1) The government's motion to dismiss (doc. no. 95) is denied.
(2) Defendant Mardedeus Mack shall continue under the conditions of supervised release previously set and modified by the court.
(3) Defendant Mack's conditions of supervised release are modified to no longer require that he participate in the Location Monitoring Program.
(4) A status hearing is set for November 24, 2015, 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 2FMJ of the Frank M. Johnson Jr. United States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama.
(5) On or before November 19, 2015, Probation, the Assistant U.S. Attorney, and defense counsel are to file statements that address the following:
(A) How defendant Mack has performed on supervised release.
(B) Whether his supervised release should be continued.
(C) If the answer to Question B is yes, whether the conditions of his supervised release should be modified.
(D) If the answer to Question B is yes, when the next status hearing should be held, that is, how many months or years later.
