United States v. Jones, 2:13cr140-MHT. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20191121746
Visitors: 20
Filed: Nov. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2019
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . It is ORDERED that defendant Jack Jones's motion to reduce restitution payments (doc. no. 115) is denied. *** Based on the government's response (doc. no. 120), which defendant Jones has not rebutted, Jones has valuable assets such as classic cars that he could use to pay down his restitution debt of over $90,000, but he refuses to allow the liquidation of his assets if the money will go to his victims. Indeed, he asked the government
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . It is ORDERED that defendant Jack Jones's motion to reduce restitution payments (doc. no. 115) is denied. *** Based on the government's response (doc. no. 120), which defendant Jones has not rebutted, Jones has valuable assets such as classic cars that he could use to pay down his restitution debt of over $90,000, but he refuses to allow the liquidation of his assets if the money will go to his victims. Indeed, he asked the government ..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
It is ORDERED that defendant Jack Jones's motion to reduce restitution payments (doc. no. 115) is denied.
***
Based on the government's response (doc. no. 120), which defendant Jones has not rebutted, Jones has valuable assets such as classic cars that he could use to pay down his restitution debt of over $90,000, but he refuses to allow the liquidation of his assets if the money will go to his victims. Indeed, he asked the government to remove a lien so he could sell some property, then changed his mind when told that some of the proceeds would go towards restitution. Given these circumstances, the court will not reduce his payments.
Source: Leagle
