McCALL v. SSC MONTGOMERY SOUTH HAVEN OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, 2:14cv588-MHT(WO). (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20141104600
Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 03, 2014
Summary: ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. It is ORDERED that the motion to stay (doc. no. 48) filed by defendant SSC Montgomery South Haven Operating Company is denied as moot. Contrary to the allegations in the motion, SSC Montgomery South Haven Operating Company's motion to dismiss and alternative motion compel arbitration (doc. no. 3) are no longer pending, for on July 23, 2014 (doc. no. 23), the court dismissed them with leave to refile. The July 23 order also required all defendants to fil
Summary: ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. It is ORDERED that the motion to stay (doc. no. 48) filed by defendant SSC Montgomery South Haven Operating Company is denied as moot. Contrary to the allegations in the motion, SSC Montgomery South Haven Operating Company's motion to dismiss and alternative motion compel arbitration (doc. no. 3) are no longer pending, for on July 23, 2014 (doc. no. 23), the court dismissed them with leave to refile. The July 23 order also required all defendants to file..
More
ORDER
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
It is ORDERED that the motion to stay (doc. no. 48) filed by defendant SSC Montgomery South Haven Operating Company is denied as moot. Contrary to the allegations in the motion, SSC Montgomery South Haven Operating Company's motion to dismiss and alternative motion compel arbitration (doc. no. 3) are no longer pending, for on July 23, 2014 (doc. no. 23), the court dismissed them with leave to refile. The July 23 order also required all defendants to file an answer to the plaintiff's complaint within 14 days, an order with which SSC Montgomery South Haven Operating Company is not in compliance.
Source: Leagle
