MARBURY v. THOMAS, 2:14-cv-195-MEF WO. (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20140610956
Visitors: 24
Filed: Jun. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 09, 2014
Summary: ORDER MARK E. FULLER, District Judge. On May 16, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #14) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. The motions for preliminary junction filed by the plaintiff are DENIED. 3. This case
Summary: ORDER MARK E. FULLER, District Judge. On May 16, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #14) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. The motions for preliminary junction filed by the plaintiff are DENIED. 3. This case ..
More
ORDER
MARK E. FULLER, District Judge.
On May 16, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #14) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the
ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
2. The motions for preliminary junction filed by the plaintiff are DENIED.
3. This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings.
Source: Leagle
