SANDERS v. GILES, 2:13cv329-MHT. (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20160719486
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 18, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2016
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, plaintiff, a state inmate, filed this lawsuit complaining of defendants' failure to protect him from an assault he suffered at the hands of another inmate. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the cour
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, plaintiff, a state inmate, filed this lawsuit complaining of defendants' failure to protect him from an assault he suffered at the hands of another inmate. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court..
More
OPINION
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff, a state inmate, filed this lawsuit complaining of defendants' failure to protect him from an assault he suffered at the hands of another inmate. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate judge's recommendation should be adopted.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
Source: Leagle
