WALTON v. THOMAS, 3:13cv-831-WHA. (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20160309d63
Visitors: 20
Filed: Mar. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 08, 2016
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #16), entered on January 29, 2016. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice because the petition is time-barred by the one-year limita
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #16), entered on January 29, 2016. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice because the petition is time-barred by the one-year limitat..
More
ORDER
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #16), entered on January 29, 2016. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby
ORDERED that this petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice because the petition is time-barred by the one-year limitation period contained in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Final Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Source: Leagle
