Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Brazzle, 2:17-cr-0484-AKK. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. Alabama Number: infdco20190109c40 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER ABDUL K. KALLON , District Judge . The court has for consideration Defendant's Motion to Suppress, doc. 15. The magistrate judge filed a report recommending that the court deny Defendant's motion, see doc. 25, and the Defendant has timely objected, see doc. 26. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's report is due to be and hereby is AD
More

ORDER

The court has for consideration Defendant's Motion to Suppress, doc. 15. The magistrate judge filed a report recommending that the court deny Defendant's motion, see doc. 25, and the Defendant has timely objected, see doc. 26. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED and his recommendation is ACCEPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Suppress, doc. 15, is DENIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer