Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Chi Chen v. U.S. Bank, National Association, C16-1109 RSM. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20191223f99 Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF YUE GU RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . THIS MATTER comes before the Court by motion of Harris Bricken McVay Sliwoski, LLP ("Harris Bricken"), counsel for Plaintiffs in the above-captioned case. Harris Bricken seeks leave to withdraw as counsel for Yue Gu whose claims were dismissed on November 1, 2019. Dkt. #199. Harris Bricken's Motion is brought under Local Rule 83.2(b)(1) and is supported by the Declaration of attor
More

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF YUE GU

THIS MATTER comes before the Court by motion of Harris Bricken McVay Sliwoski, LLP ("Harris Bricken"), counsel for Plaintiffs in the above-captioned case. Harris Bricken seeks leave to withdraw as counsel for Yue Gu whose claims were dismissed on November 1, 2019. Dkt. #199.

Harris Bricken's Motion is brought under Local Rule 83.2(b)(1) and is supported by the Declaration of attorney Thea Lao who reports a fundamental disagreement with Plaintiff Gu following a substitution of counsel in March 2019.

Harris Bricken further submits that Plaintiff Gu's last-known address is:

220 Weinisi Huayuan Phase II, No. 502 Jinshi Road, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214121, China

The Court, having considered the briefing submitted in relation to the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiff Yue Gu, hereby find and ORDERS that Plaintiffs' Motion, Dkt. #187, is GRANTED. Harris Bricken, and its attorneys Daniel P. Harris, William R. Kiendl, Sara Xia, and Jihee Ahn will be noted by the Clerk of the Court as prior counsel for Plaintiff Gu.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer