United States v. Hastings, 5:19-cr-0153-LCB-JHE-1. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20191011m07
Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 10, 2019
Summary: ORDER LILES C. BURKE , District Judge . The magistrate judge entered a report on August 16, 2019, recommending that the defendant's motion to suppress be denied. The report and recommendation provided that the either party was entitled to file specific written objections within 14 days of its entry. However, no objections were filed. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the Court file, including the report and recommendation, the magistrate judge's repor
Summary: ORDER LILES C. BURKE , District Judge . The magistrate judge entered a report on August 16, 2019, recommending that the defendant's motion to suppress be denied. The report and recommendation provided that the either party was entitled to file specific written objections within 14 days of its entry. However, no objections were filed. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the Court file, including the report and recommendation, the magistrate judge's report..
More
ORDER
LILES C. BURKE, District Judge.
The magistrate judge entered a report on August 16, 2019, recommending that the defendant's motion to suppress be denied. The report and recommendation provided that the either party was entitled to file specific written objections within 14 days of its entry. However, no objections were filed.
Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the Court file, including the report and recommendation, the magistrate judge's report is ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the defendant's motion to suppress (Doc. 13) is DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle