Jackson v. U.S., 14-00057-WS-N. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20180816954
Visitors: 17
Filed: Aug. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 15, 2018
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE , District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendations (Doc. 79) of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B)-(C), Rule 8(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings for the United States District Courts, and S.D. Ala. GenLR 72(a)(2)(R), and dated July 23, 2018, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE , District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendations (Doc. 79) of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B)-(C), Rule 8(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings for the United States District Courts, and S.D. Ala. GenLR 72(a)(2)(R), and dated July 23, 2018, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this ..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM H. STEELE, District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendations (Doc. 79) of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)-(C), Rule 8(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings for the United States District Courts, and S.D. Ala. GenLR 72(a)(2)(R), and dated July 23, 2018, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Movant William E. Jackson's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 72) is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that Jackson is DENIED a Certificate of Appealability in relation to this final adverse order. Finally, the Court certifies that any appeal of this order would be without merit and therefore not taken in good faith. Thus, Jackson is not entitled proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.
Source: Leagle
