United States v. Davis, 4:19-CR-091. (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20200131947
Visitors: 31
Filed: Jan. 30, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 30, 2020
Summary: SECOND AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER CHRISTOPHER L. RAY , Magistrate Judge . At the Status Conference on December 12, 2019, the parties indicated that additional time was necessary for defendant to gather mitigating evidence to present to the United States Attorney General. Doc. 131. They now move, jointly, to modify the Amended Scheduling Order (doc. 108) in this case. Doc. 132. The Court has considered the parties' submission, GRANTS the motion (doc. 132), and adopts the proposed deadlines as
Summary: SECOND AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER CHRISTOPHER L. RAY , Magistrate Judge . At the Status Conference on December 12, 2019, the parties indicated that additional time was necessary for defendant to gather mitigating evidence to present to the United States Attorney General. Doc. 131. They now move, jointly, to modify the Amended Scheduling Order (doc. 108) in this case. Doc. 132. The Court has considered the parties' submission, GRANTS the motion (doc. 132), and adopts the proposed deadlines as ..
More
SECOND AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER
CHRISTOPHER L. RAY, Magistrate Judge.
At the Status Conference on December 12, 2019, the parties indicated that additional time was necessary for defendant to gather mitigating evidence to present to the United States Attorney General. Doc. 131. They now move, jointly, to modify the Amended Scheduling Order (doc. 108) in this case. Doc. 132. The Court has considered the parties' submission, GRANTS the motion (doc. 132), and adopts the proposed deadlines as follows:
DATE DEADLINE
April 15, 2020 — Defendant's Submission of Evidence in Mitigation to
U.S. Attorney's Office
— Defendant's Notice of Alibi Defense Pursuant to
Fed.R.Crim.P. 12.1
— Defendant's Notice of Insanity Defense and/or
Expert Evidence of a Mental Condition Pursuant to
Fed.R.Crim.P. 12.2(a)-(b)
April 30, 2020 — Government's Submission to DOJ of Memorandum
and U.S. Attorney's Recommendation re: Death
Penalty
May 13, 2020 — Motions Pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(b)(3)
— Government's Request for Mental Examination
Pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 12.2(c)(1)(B)
— Government's Notice Pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. 702
and Fed.R.Crim.P. 16(a)(1)(G)
— Parties' Notice Pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. 404(b) and
609(b)
June 15, 2020 — Responses to Motions Filed Pursuant to
Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(b)(3)
— Defendant's Notice Pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. 702 and
Fed.R.Crim.P. 16(b)(1)(C)
July 3, 2020 — Government's Supplemental Expert Notice Pursuant
to Fed.R.Evid. 702 and Fed.R.Crim.P. 16(a)(1)(G)
July 24, 2020 — Parties' Notice Pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. 807 and 902
Not later than September — Government's Notice of Intent to Seek or Not Seek
1, 2020 the Death Penalty
The Court also adopts the parties' proposals for tentative deadlines for pre-trial procedures. If the U.S. Attorney General elects to seek the death penalty, the Court will revisit the remainder of this scheduling order with the parties to address motions pertaining to capital punishment. Although the deadlines are tentative, as they are calculated based on the days before an as-yet-undetermined trial date, the Court emphasizes that they are purely provisional and subject to the modification at the discretion of the District Judge. The tentative pre-trial deadlines are adopted as follows:
Trial-120 — Pretrial Motions in Limine, including any motions
relating to expert testimony
— Motions for Judicial Notice
— Trial Stipulations
Trial-106 — Responses to Motions in Limine
Trial-99 — Replies in Support of Motions in Limine
Trial-90 — Hearing on Motions in Limine and Pretrial
Admission of Evidence
Trial-30 — Supplemental Hearing on Pretrial Admission of
Evidence, if Needed
— Additional Stipulations
Trial-21 — Proposed Voir Dire and Jury Instructions
— Remaining Giglio/Jencks/Fed.R.Crim.P. 26.2
Disclosures
Trial-14 — Objections to Proposed Voir Dire and Jury
Instructions
Trial-8 — Trial Memoranda (if needed)
— Parties' witness and exhibit lists emailed to
Courtroom Deputy (in PDF and Word formats)
— Parties' trial exhibits in electronic format (on USB
drive) to Courtroom Deputy
Trial-7 — Pretrial Conference
Trial — Trial
As this case has been previously designated complex, the statutory time limits imposed by 18 U.S.C. § 1361 for pretrial proceedings are tolled. Doc. 49
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
