Hickman v. Jones, 2:15-CV-352-ECM. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20180821856
Visitors: 27
Filed: Aug. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER EMILY C. MARKS , District Judge . On July 18, 2018, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #120) to which no objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. The ADOC defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 3. The medical defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED. 4. The medical defendants' motion for summary judgm
Summary: ORDER EMILY C. MARKS , District Judge . On July 18, 2018, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #120) to which no objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. The ADOC defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 3. The medical defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED. 4. The medical defendants' motion for summary judgme..
More
ORDER
EMILY C. MARKS, District Judge.
On July 18, 2018, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #120) to which no objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
2. The ADOC defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.
3. The medical defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED.
4. The medical defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.
5. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendants.
6. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
7. Costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plaintiff.
A separate final judgment will be entered in accordance with this order.
Source: Leagle
